Re: [RFC] weirdness in ext4_sync_file()
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: 2016-07-06 12:00:59
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
Subsystem:
ext4 file system, filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest · Maintainers:
"Theodore Ts'o", Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds
On Fri 24-06-16 05:36:05, Al Viro wrote:
Could somebody explain when would the second part of that test _not_ be true?
if (!ret && !hlist_empty(&inode->i_dentry))
ret = ext4_sync_parent(inode);
inode is that of an opened file; how could it possibly _not_ have a dentry
alias? Is that code actually supposed to check if the sucker is not
unlinked?Yes, that's what the test was supposed to do I believe.
If so, it's not what we are actually checking - pinned dentry remains
positive (and unhashed) after unlink(2). What's more, the loop in
ext4_sync_parent() is vulnerable to races with rmdir(2) - if you get
unlink and rmdir of ancestors between
next = igrab(d_inode(dentry->d_parent));
and
inode = next;
ret = sync_mapping_buffers(inode->i_mapping);
if (ret)
break;
ret = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 1);
if (ret)
break;
you are risking interesting things done in the middle of rmdir and/or
unlink; that might be actually safe, but in that case it's worth a comment
explaining that.You are right and it should be harmless. I'm now testing the patch below. Thanks for your comments.
From 3dbea3e4e58d9ad81f38e8f89f9f569daef5a800 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:55:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: Cleanup ext4_sync_parent() A condition !hlist_empty(&inode->i_dentry) is always true for open file. Just remove it. Also ext4_sync_parent() could use some explanation why races with rmdir() are not an issue - add a comment explaining that. Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> --- fs/ext4/fsync.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
index 8850254136ae..9b9335796fbc 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c@@ -61,6 +61,13 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode) break; iput(inode); inode = next; + /* + * The directory inode may have gone through rmdir by now. But + * the inode itself and its blocks are still allocated (we hold + * a reference to the inode so it didn't go through + * ext4_evict_inode()) and so we are safe to flush metadata + * blocks and the inode. + */ ret = sync_mapping_buffers(inode->i_mapping); if (ret) break;
@@ -107,7 +114,7 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync) if (!journal) { ret = generic_file_fsync(file, start, end, datasync); - if (!ret && !hlist_empty(&inode->i_dentry)) + if (!ret) ret = ext4_sync_parent(inode); goto out; }
--
2.6.6
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR