Re: [PATCH 1/6] statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info available
From: Jeff Layton <hidden>
Date: 2016-05-10 13:21:05
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 00:00 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:02:58AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
AT_FORCE_ATTR_SYNC can be set in flags.????This will require a network filesystem to synchronise its attributes with the server. AT_NO_ATTR_SYNC can be set in flags.????This will suppress synchronisation with the server in a network filesystem.????The resulting values should be considered approximate.And what happens if neither is set?I'd suggest we have the documentation state that the lack of either flag leaves it up to the filesystem. In the case of NFS, you'd get "normal" attribute cache behavior, for instance which is governed by the ac* attributes. We should also note that in the case of something like AT_NO_ATTR_SYNC on NFS, you might _still_ end up talking to the server if the client has nothing in-core for that inode.File systems specific "legacy" defaults are a bad idea. If we can't describe the semantics we should not allow them, never mind making the the default. I'd strongly suggest picking one of the above flags as the default behavior and only allowing the other as optional flag. I suspect NO_SYNC is the better one for the flag, as otherwise people will be surprised once they test their default case on a network filesystem.
Ok, that's a good point. So basically you suggest that xstat should always have FORCE_SYNC semantics unless the NO_SYNC flag is set? Given that we don't need to worry about legacy users with this interface, that seems like a reasonable approach to me. -- Jeff Layton [off-list ref] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html