Re: [PATCH 3/7] ext2: Avoid DAX zeroing to corrupt data
From: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Date: 2016-05-17 06:52:50
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, nvdimm
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 17:22 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
On Thu 12-05-16 12:45:22, Ross Zwisler wrote:quoted
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:58:49AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:quoted
Currently ext2 zeroes any data blocks allocated for DAX inode however it still returns them as BH_New. Thus DAX code zeroes them again in dax_insert_mapping() which can possibly overwrite the data that has been already stored to those blocks by a racing dax_io(). Avoid marking pre-zeroed buffers as new. Reviewed-by: Ross Zwisler <redacted> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> --- fs/ext2/inode.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c index 6bd58e6ff038..1f07b758b968 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c@@ -745,11 +745,11 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode*inode, mutex_unlock(&ei->truncate_mutex); goto cleanup; } - } + } else + set_buffer_new(bh_result); ext2_splice_branch(inode, iblock, partial, indirect_blks, count); mutex_unlock(&ei->truncate_mutex); - set_buffer_new(bh_result); got_it: map_bh(bh_result, inode->i_sb, le32_to_cpu(chain[depth- 1].key)); if (count > blocks_to_boundary) -- 2.6.6Interestingly this change is causing a bunch of xfstests regressions for me with ext2 + DAX. All of these tests pass without this one change.Good catch. Attached patch fixes this issue for me. Preferably it should be merged before the above ext2 change. Honza
Hey Jan, In my patch 3 of the error handling series, I have: - err = dax_clear_sectors(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, - le32_to_cpu(chain[depth-1].key) << - (inode->i_blkbits - 9), - 1 << inode->i_blkbits); + err = sb_issue_zeroout(inode->i_sb, + le32_to_cpu(chain[depth-1].key), 1, GFP_NOFS); Does this mean I have to change to send the sb_issue_zeroout for 'count' blocks.. i.e. - err = dax_clear_sectors(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, - le32_to_cpu(chain[depth-1].key) << - (inode->i_blkbits - 9), - 1 << inode->i_blkbits); + err = sb_issue_zeroout(inode->i_sb, + le32_to_cpu(chain[depth-1].key), count, GFP_NOFS); If so, I'll update my series tomorrow to include in both of these changes. Thanks, -Vishal