Re: [PATCH] ext4 crypto: migrate into vfs's crypto engine
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: 2016-05-05 04:22:51
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:20:22PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:15:36PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:quoted
This patch removes the most parts of internal crypto codes. And then, it modifies and adds some ext4-specific crypt codes to use the generic facility. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>So I just tried this patch, and one big problem with it is that it breaks backwards compatibility with existing userspace code, which assumes that the name of the keys are prefixed with "ext4:". I see that in fs/crypto.h you've changed it to be "fscrypto:". Which is more general, perhaps, but the problem is that it's not what the existing shipping code (for example, in the Android N preview release) and what e2fsprogs's e4crypto is using.
I also worried about that before, but I thought there was no shipped fs_encryption-enabled product. Actually, f2fs has the same issue as well, since "f2fs:" was used before. :(
If we want to use fscrypto: as a more general prefix, I could see doing that, but we need to provide for backwards compatibility --- which means that at least for ext4, we will need to look for keys using both the new and old prefix, and we would also want change e4crypto to set keys with both the "ext4" and the more general "fscrypto" prefix.
Got it. Let me add (*key_prefix(inode)) in fscrypt_operations so that filesystem can give a specific prefix additionally. Once fscrypto supports both of prefixes, does e4crypto have to set "fscrypto"? The "ext4" should work all the time tho. Thanks,
Cheers, - Ted