Re: [PATCH 41/42] block: do not use REQ_FLUSH for tracking flush support
From: Juergen Gross <hidden>
Date: 2016-04-15 10:50:39
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-bcache, linux-btrfs, linux-f2fs-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-raid, linux-scsi, linux-xfs, lkml, ocfs2-devel
On 15/04/16 12:40, mchristi@redhat.com wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Mike Christie <redacted> The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers so they can send a write/flush combo. This patch drops xen's use of REQ_FLUSH to track if it supports REQ_OP_FLUSH requests, so REQ_FLUSH can be deleted. v6: - Dropped parts of patch handled by Jens's QUEUE_FLAG_WC/FUA patches and modified patch to check feature_flush/fua bits. Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <redacted> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> --- drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c index f01691a..d6429e7 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c
...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -985,24 +981,22 @@ static int xlvbd_init_blk_queue(struct gendisk *gd, u16 sector_size, return 0; } -static const char *flush_info(unsigned int feature_flush) +static const char *flush_info(struct blkfront_info *info) { - switch (feature_flush & ((REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA))) { - case REQ_FLUSH|REQ_FUA: + if (info->feature_flush && info->feature_fua) return "barrier: enabled;"; - case REQ_FLUSH: + else if (info->feature_fua)
Shouldn't this test feature_flush?
return "flush diskcache: enabled;";
- default:
+ else
return "barrier or flush: disabled;";
- }
}
static void xlvbd_flush(struct blkfront_info *info)
{
- blk_queue_write_cache(info->rq, info->feature_flush & REQ_FLUSH,
- info->feature_flush & REQ_FUA);
+ blk_queue_write_cache(info->rq, info->feature_flush ? true : false,
+ info->feature_flush ? true : false);And here the second test should be feature_fua?
pr_info("blkfront: %s: %s %s %s %s %s\n",
- info->gd->disk_name, flush_info(info->feature_flush),
+ info->gd->disk_name, flush_info(info),
"persistent grants:", info->feature_persistent ?
"enabled;" : "disabled;", "indirect descriptors:",
info->max_indirect_segments ? "enabled;" : "disabled;");Juergen _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs