Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: don't use ioends for direct write completions
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2016-02-08 09:17:14
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs, ocfs2-devel
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2016-02-08 09:17:14
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs, ocfs2-devel
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 08:31:21AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:17:31PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:quoted
Right now this series is in a stable branch in the XFS tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git xfs-dio-fix-4.6 If you want to push it through some other tree, please let me know when/where it is committed so I can rebuild the XFS for-next branch appropriately from a stable commit/branch...That's how I think it should be handled. This would also allow the ext4 and ocfs2 maintainers to depend on the stable branch to clean up their direct I/O completion handling in this merge window if they want to.
I can't tell if you are saying what I've done is fine if the xfs-dio-fix-4.6 branch is stable (so others can pull it) or whether it should be in some other tree. Can you clarify, Christoph? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com