Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] dax: support dirty DAX entries in radix tree
From: Ross Zwisler <hidden>
Date: 2015-12-23 00:16:27
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm, linux-xfs, lkml
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:46:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 22:22:15 -0700 Ross Zwisler [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Add support for tracking dirty DAX entries in the struct address_space radix tree. This tree is already used for dirty page writeback, and it already supports the use of exceptional (non struct page*) entries. In order to properly track dirty DAX pages we will insert new exceptional entries into the radix tree that represent dirty DAX PTE or PMD pages. These exceptional entries will also contain the writeback addresses for the PTE or PMD faults that we can use at fsync/msync time. There are currently two types of exceptional entries (shmem and shadow) that can be placed into the radix tree, and this adds a third. We rely on the fact that only one type of exceptional entry can be found in a given radix tree based on its usage. This happens for free with DAX vs shmem but we explicitly prevent shadow entries from being added to radix trees for DAX mappings. The only shadow entries that would be generated for DAX radix trees would be to track zero page mappings that were created for holes. These pages would receive minimal benefit from having shadow entries, and the choice to have only one type of exceptional entry in a given radix tree makes the logic simpler both in clear_exceptional_entry() and in the rest of DAX. ...--- a/include/linux/dax.h +++ b/include/linux/dax.h@@ -36,4 +36,9 @@ static inline bool vma_is_dax(struct vm_area_struct *vma) { return vma->vm_file && IS_DAX(vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host); } + +static inline bool dax_mapping(struct address_space *mapping) +{ + return mapping->host && IS_DAX(mapping->host); +}Can we make this evaluate to plain old "0" when CONFIG_FS_DAX=n? That way a bunch of code in callers will fall away as well. If the compiler has any brains then a good way to do this would be to make IS_DAX be "0" but one would need to check that the zeroness properly propagated out of the inline.
Ah, it already works that way due to some magic with IS_DAX(). I believe we already use the fact that blocks protected by IS_DAX() go away if CONFIG_FS_DAX isn't set. The trick is that S_DAX is defined to be 0 if CONFIG_FS_DAX isn't set. I'm pretty sure this is working because of the code in filemap_write_and_wait_range(). I added a block with the later "dax: add support for fsync/msync" patch which looks like this:
@@ -482,6 +482,9 @@ int filemap_write_and_wait_range(struct address_space *mapping, { int err = 0; + if (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrdax) + dax_writeback_mapping_range(mapping, lstart, lend); +
Without the dax_mapping() check there the behavior is the same, but we fail to compile if CONFIG_FS_DAX isn't set because dax_writeback_mapping_range() isn't defined. (Guess how I found that out. :) )
quoted
#endifdiff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 3aa5142..b9ac534 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h@@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ struct address_space { /* Protected by tree_lock together with the radix tree */ unsigned long nrpages; /* number of total pages */ unsigned long nrshadows; /* number of shadow entries */ + unsigned long nrdax; /* number of DAX entries */hm, that's unfortunate - machines commonly carry tremendous numbers of address_spaces in memory and adding pork to them is rather a big deal. We can't avoid this somehow? Maybe share the space with nrshadows by some means? Find some other field which is unused for dax files?
Jan Kara noticed the same thing: https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2015-December/003626.html It'll be fixed in the next spin of the patch set. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs