Re: [PATCH v8 00/41] Richacls
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2015-10-07 07:50:54
Also in:
linux-api, linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2015-10-16 · Re: [PATCH v8 00/41] Richacls · Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
- 2015-10-07 · Re: [PATCH v8 00/41] Richacls · Steve French <hidden>
- 2015-10-06 · Re: [PATCH v8 00/41] Richacls · Steve French <hidden>
- 2015-10-06 · Re: [PATCH v8 00/41] Richacls · Andreas Gruenbacher <hidden>
- 2015-10-06 · Re: [PATCH v8 00/41] Richacls · Andreas Grünbacher <hidden>
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:26:09PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
And any disk filesystems that have their own non-POSIX ACLs, such as HFS, NTFS, ZFS would presumably also need to map the in-kernel Richacl format to their on-disk format.
No, we did this mistake with Posix ACLs, and we're not going to repeat it here. Filesystems with their own slightly different ACLs must not reuse the interface.