Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2014-11-25

Re: [PATCH-v2 0/5] add support for a lazytime mount option

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2014-11-24 09:07:55
Also in: linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs

What's the test coverage for this?  xfstest generic/192 tests that
atime is persisted over remounts, which we had a bug with when XFS
used to have a lazy atime implementation somewhat similar to the
proposal.

We should have something similar for c/mtime as well.  Also a test to
ensure timestamps are persisted afer a fsync, although right now I can't
imagine how to do that genericly as no other filesystem seems to have
an equivaent to XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN.

It seems you also handle i_version updates lazily. although that's
not mentioned anywhere.  I actually have a clarification request out on
the IETF NFSv4 list about the persistance requirements for the change
counter but I've not seen an answer to it yet.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help