Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 5 authors, 2014-07-14

RE: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Add support IOC_MOV_DATA ioctl

From: Dmitry Monakhov <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-14 16:27:26
Also in: linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs, lkml

On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:33:21 +0900, Namjae Jeon [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:59:49PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
quoted
This patch implements fs ioctl's IOC_MOV_DATA for XFS.
Shouldn't this share code with the XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT implementation?
Lukas has raised the same question for ext4.
Both xfs(XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT) and ext4(EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) has ioctls which uses
almost similar kind of structure as struct mov_data.
As such, there seems to be possiblity for sharing basic code (I will try)
used for sanity checking in IOC_MOV_DATA to be shared with these ioctls
but the core functionality code will remain different.

Thanks!
Actually they are differ. EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT copy data inside kernel,
but XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT live this job to userpsace see:
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git;a=blob;f=fsr/xfs_fsr.c packfile
And I'll vote to make EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT deprecated, and implement EXT4_IOC_SWAPEXT
as XFS does that.
Ted, Lukas what do you think about that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help