Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 2 authors, 2014-05-07

Re: [PATCH -v2 2/3] mke2fs: print extra information about existing ext2/3/4 file systems

From: Lukáš Czerner <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-07 08:16:01

On Tue, 6 May 2014, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 22:46:21 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Lukáš Czerner <redacted>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <redacted>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/3] mke2fs: print extra information about existing
    ext2/3/4 file systems

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:42:37PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
quoted
quoted
+	retval = ext2fs_open2(device, 0, 0, 0, 0, unix_io_manager, &fs);
Sorry for not noticing this earlier, but we might want to pass
EXT2_FLAG_64BITS.
Done.
quoted
quoted
+	} else if (sb->s_mkfs_time) {
+		tm = sb->s_mkfs_time;
+		printf(_("\tcreated on %s"), ctime(&tm));
+	} else if (sb->s_mkfs_time) {
This does not seem right, you've already checked for s_mkfs_time and
if was not set if you got here. I guess, it should be something else
? s_wtime perhaps ? But, can this be set when the fs was not mounted
(like using ext2fs library ?)
quoted
+		tm = sb->s_mtime;
If you got here, then again this is not set.

Yes, that's a cut and paste typo, thanks for spotting it.  It should
have been:

	} else if (sb->s_mkfs_time) {
		tm = sb->s_mkfs_time;
		printf(_("\tcreated on %s"), ctime(&tm));
	} else if (sb->s_mtime) {  <========
But you're already checking for sb->s_mtime in the first condition,
am I missing something ?

Thanks!
-Lukas
		tm = sb->s_mtime;
		printf(_("\tlast modified on %s"), ctime(&tm));
	}


Cheers,

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help