On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 05:46:28PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:

quoted

+In order to support this method, the storage must be byte-accessable by

                                                        byte-accessible

Thanks.  Fixed.

quoted

+- ensuring that there is sufficient locking between reads, writes,
+  truncates and page faults

     truncates, and
but that's up to you and your editor/proofreader etc.  :)

Ooh, do we really get to have a discussion about the Oxford Comma on
linux-kernel?  :-)

I haven't actually run this material past my editor (who is my wife, so
I need really convincing arguments to do it your way instead of hers),
but funnily we had a conversation about the Oxford Comma while on holiday
last week.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma has a reasonably
exhaustive discourse on the subject, and I learned that she's probably
primarily against it because of her journalism degree.

quoted

+Even if the kernel or its modules are stored on an filesystem that supports

                                                   a

Good catch.  I think I started out with 'an fs', then expanded it to
"an filesystem" which of course is nonsense.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."