Re: [PATCH v4 21/22] Add support for pmd_faults
From: Kirill A. Shutemov <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-23 15:10:03
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-mm
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 07:50:31AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 03:41:13PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:quoted
quoted
+ /* Fall back to PTEs if we're going to COW */ + if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) + return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;Why?If somebody mmaps a file with MAP_PRIVATE and changes a single byte, I think we should allocate a single page to hold that change, not a PMD's worth of pages.
We try allocate new huge page in the same situation for AnonTHP. I don't see a reason why not to do the same here. It would be much harder (if possible) to collapse small page into a huge one later.
quoted
quoted
+ pgoff = ((address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + vma->vm_pgoff; + size = (i_size_read(inode) + PAGE_SIZE - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT; + if (pgoff >= size) + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; + if ((pgoff | PG_PMD_COLOUR) >= size) + return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;I don't think it's necessary to fallback in this case. Do you care about SIGBUS behaviour or what?I'm looking to preserve the same behaviour we see with PTE mappings. I mean, it's supposed to be _transparent_ huge pages, right?
We can't be totally transparent. At least from performance point of view. The question is whether it's critical to preserve SIGBUS beheviour. I would prefer to map last page in mapping with huge pages too, if it's possible. Do you know anyone who relay on SIGBUS for correctness?
quoted
quoted
+ insert: + length = xip_get_pfn(inode, &bh, &pfn); + if (length < 0) + return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS; + if (length < PMD_SIZE) + return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK; + if (pfn & PG_PMD_COLOUR) + return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK; /* not aligned */Without assistance from get_unmapped_area() you will hit this all the time (511 of 512 on x86_64).Yes ... I thought you were working on that part for your transparent huge page cache patchset?
Yeah, I have patch for x86-64. Just a side note.
quoted
And the check should be moved before get_block(), I think.Can't. The PFN we're checking is the PFN of the storage. We have to call get_block() to find out where it's going to be.
I see. -- Kirill A. Shutemov -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>