Re: [PATCH 0/3] ext4: introduce two new ioctls
From: Zheng Liu <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-24 14:14:39
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Zheng Liu <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-24 14:14:39
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:37:57AM +0000, Sidorov, Andrei wrote:
On 24.06.2013 13:36, Namjae Jeon wrote:quoted
Currently, we can try implementing dave's suggesstion of introducing a new flag FALLOC_FL_COLLAPSE_RANGE for falloctae instead of individual ioctls for both XFS and EXT4. Thanks.Hi, Currently PUNCH_HOLE requires KEEP_SIZE to be set as well. I think there is no need to invent COLLAPSE_RANGE, but instead fallocate should support PUNCH_HOLE without KEEP_SIZE. However I'm not sure that putting block alignment restriction is a right way to go.
PUNCH_HOLE without KEEP_SIZE makes sense to me.
Regards,
- Zheng