On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:48:06PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:

On 12/13/2012 12:08 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:

quoted

Several complaints have been received regarding long file write latencies when
memory pages must be held stable during writeback.  Since it might not be
acceptable to stall programs for the entire duration of a page write (which may
take many milliseconds even on good hardware), enable a second strategy wherein
pages are snapshotted as part of submit_bio; the snapshot can be held stable
while writes continue.

This provides a band-aid to provide stable page writes on jbd without needing
to backport the fixed locking scheme in jbd2.  A mount option is added to ext4
to allow administrators to enable it there.

I'm a bit confused as to what it has to do with ext3.  Wouldn't this be
useful as a mount option everywhere, though?

ext3 requires snapshots; the rest are ok with either strategy.

*If* snapshotting is generally liked, then yes I'll go redo it as a vfs mount
option.

If this becomes widely used, would it be better to snapshot on
wait_for_stable_page instead of on io submission?

That really depends on how long you can afford to wait and how much free
memory you have. :)  It's all a big tradeoff between write latency and
consumption of memory pages and bandwidth, and one that I doubt I'm qualified
to make for everyone.

FWIW, I'm about to pound pretty hard on this whole patchset on a box
that doesn't need stable pages.  I'll let you know how it goes.

Yay!

--D