Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly | linux-ext4 | Ratatoskr

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly · Jeff Moyer <hidden> · 2012-11-21
Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2012-11-21
Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly · Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> · 2012-11-21
Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly · Jeffrey Ellis <hidden> · 2012-11-21

Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: 2012-11-21 18:29:01
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

2012-11-21 · Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly · Jeff Moyer <hidden>
2012-11-21 · Re: [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
2012-11-20 · [PATCH 1/9] vfs: Handle O_SYNC AIO DIO in generic code properly · Darrick J. Wong <hidden>

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:58:05AM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:

quoted

I'd like to use this as a vehicle to revisit how dio completions work.

I don't like the sound of that.  ;-)  It sounds like this bugfix may get
further delayed by the desire for unrelated code cleanup.

I've got a prototype that isn't much more invasive than the current
series.  I'll finish it up and run it through QA and will post it
tomorrow.