Re: [RFC v4 03/15] vfs,hot_track: add the function for collecting I/O frequency
From: Zheng Liu <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-28 07:55:20
Also in:
linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel, lkml
From: Zheng Liu <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-28 07:55:20
Also in:
linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel, lkml
Hi Zhiyong, On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:08:55PM +0800, zwu.kernel@gmail.com wrote: [snip]
@@ -199,6 +342,54 @@ err: } /* + * Main function to update access frequency from read/writepage(s) hooks + */ +inline void hot_update_freqs(struct inode *inode, u64 start, + u64 len, int rw)
This function seems too big. So we really need to inline this function? Regards, Zheng
+{
+ struct hot_info *root = inode->i_sb->s_hot_root;
+ struct hot_inode_item *he;
+ struct hot_range_item *hr;
+ u32 cur, end;
+
+ if (!root || (len == 0))
+ return;
+
+ he = hot_inode_item_find(root, inode->i_ino);
+ if (IS_ERR(he)) {
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
+ hot_freq_data_update(&he->hot_inode.hot_freq_data, rw);
+ spin_unlock(&he->hot_inode.lock);
+
+ /*
+ * Align ranges on RANGE_SIZE boundary
+ * to prevent proliferation of range structs
+ */
+ end = (start + len + RANGE_SIZE - 1) >> RANGE_BITS;
+ for (cur = (start >> RANGE_BITS); cur < end; cur++) {
+ hr = hot_range_item_find(he, cur);
+ if (IS_ERR(hr)) {
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ hot_inode_item_put(he);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ spin_lock(&hr->hot_range.lock);
+ hot_freq_data_update(&hr->hot_range.hot_freq_data, rw);
+ spin_unlock(&hr->hot_range.lock);
+
+ hot_range_item_put(hr);
+ }
+
+ hot_inode_item_put(he);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hot_update_freqs);