Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 8 authors, 2012-10-29

Re: Apparent serious progressive ext4 data corruption bug in 3.6.3 (and other stable branches?)

From: Jannis Achstetter <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-24 22:05:23
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Am 24.10.2012 23:31, schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 09:13:01PM +0200, Jannis Achstetter wrote:
quoted
As a "normal linux user" I'm interested in the practical things to do
now to avoid data loss. I'm running several systems with 3.6.2 and ext4.
Fearing loss of data:
- Is there a way to see whether the journal of a specific partition has
been wrapped (since mounting) so that umounting and mounting (or doing a
reboot to downgrade the kernel) is safe?
[...]
(Keep in mind this is why commercial software corporations like
[...]
can all work towards finding the best answer.)
I really appreciate this and I like it since although the root-cause
hasn't been found for sure yet, it is a transparent process.
And it's great good thing that we can directly talk to the involved devs
w/o going through 200 layers of marketing and spokesmen (as it were with
the two companies you mentioned).
It's a little bit too early for this meme:
    http://memegenerator.net/instance/28936247
That's a good one :)
But do please note that that Fedora !7 users have been using 3.6.2 for
[...]
with trailing edge kernel sources.  :-)
Yes, the downside of running Gentoo unstable. But even the "stable" tree
used 3.5.7 and this is the one my NAS uses where I do store my backups.
Nevertheless, your reply eased my mind to a great extend and I'm
thankful for it.
Time for bed now :)

	Jannis
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help