Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8 v2] ext4: extent status tree (step 1)
flat view
From: Zheng Liu <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-21 01:51:43
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:41:26AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Hi Zheng, I've applied your patches to the ext4 patch queue, and so they have shown up in the dev branch of the ext4 git tree. One thing I've noticed in my regression tests is that there is a new test failure with this patch series applied. It is xfstests #230, when bigalloc is enabled: FSTYP -- ext4 PLATFORM -- Linux/i686 candygram 3.6.0-rc1-00043-ga3229f7 MKFS_OPTIONS -- -q -O bigalloc /dev/vdc MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o acl,user_xattr -o block_validity /dev/vdc /vdc 230 - output mismatch (see 230.out.bad)--- 230.out 2012-09-19 01:15:44.000000000 -0400 +++ 230.out.bad 2012-09-20 10:37:05.143728890 -0400@@ -5,7 +5,9 @@ ### create files, setting up ownership (type=u) ### some buffered IO (type=u) Write 900k... +pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded Rewrite 1001k... +pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded Write 1000k... pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded Write 4096...@@ -21,7 +23,9 @@ ### create files, setting up ownership (type=g) ### some buffered IO (type=g) Write 900k... +pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded Rewrite 1001k... +pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded Write 1000k... pwrite64: Disk quota exceeded Write 4096...Ran: 230 Failures: 230 Failed 1 of 1 tests I haven't had time to take a look at this, and it's only failing when bigalloc is enabled. If you could take a look I would greatly appreciate it.
Hi Ted, Sorry for delay reply. I will look at this problem after I finish inline data patch set for e2fsprogs. Thanks for your review. Regards, Zheng