Re: [PATCH 03/10] ext4: fix unwritten counter leakage
From: Dmitry Monakhov <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-27 12:54:16
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:34:20 +0200, Jan Kara [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu 27-09-12 16:19:01, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:quoted
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:07:14 +0200, Jan Kara [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon 24-09-12 15:44:13, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:quoted
ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag() will increment i_unwritten counter, so once we mark end_io with END_IO_UNWRITTEN we have to revert it back^^ EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTENquoted
on error path. - add missed error checks to prevent counter leakage - ext4_end_io_nolock() will clear END_IO_UNWRITTEN flag to signal^^ EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTENquoted
that conversion finished. - add BUGON to free_end_io() to prevent similar leackage in future.^^ BUG_ON ^^ext4_free_io_end() ^^ leakagequoted
Visiable effect of this bug is that unaligned aio_stress may deadlock^^ Visible Umm, and won't it be more foolproof it we just decrement i_unwritten in ext4_free_io_end() when we see EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN set?I'd like to consider BUG_ON inside ext4_free_io_end as a sanity check to force all callers to perform all necessary error checks in known context.I'm not sure how "performing all necessary error checks in known context" relates to ext4_free_io_end() cleaning up the structure on its own or whether someone has to do it beforehand... Can you maybe elaborate a bit more?
I assume that if end_io was tagged with UNWRITTEN flag it should goes trough complete_io_list and end_io_nolock(), or caller should cancel it by itself in case of error, otherwise we may miss valid unwritten end_io but was not scheduled to complete_end_io routine by occasion (and endup in silent data loss). In my opinion at the time then ext4_free_io_end() was called all possible conversions should be completed.
quoted
quoted
That still leaves the mess with EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN unhandled. But that's a separate issue. We seem to clear that flag only in ext4_ext_direct_IO() although it could be set even when buffered write converts extents. And error cases seem to be buggy as well.No, each unwritten extent will be added to i_complete_io_list regardless to it's origin (buffered or DIO), and will be completed via ext4_end_io_nolock(). So assertion is correct.Yes, I agree with what you say. My note was just an off-topic rambling about inode flag EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN whose handling seem to be buggy as well. Honza -- Jan Kara [off-list ref] SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html