Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2012-08-25

Re: [PATCH]:dir.c patch

From: Bernd Schubert <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-25 21:36:09
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On 08/25/2012 10:37 PM, Christopher Sacchi wrote:
Here is a non-style issue dir.c-patch, and as far as I can see from
the lines of code, the compilation errors weren't about what I put in.
This patch fixes a "break" statement inside an "if" statement, as
obviously not correct.
Why should that not be correct? It breaks the while(1) loop?
quoted hunk
Here's the patch for the kernel version v3.6.0rc3:

--
Signed-off-by: Christopher P. Sacchi <redacted>
--- dir.c	2012-08-25 15:47:24.260443900 -0400
+++ dir.c	2012-08-25 16:02:05.458845600 -0400
@@ -580,7 +580,6 @@ static int ext4_dx_readdir(struct file *
 				return ret;
 			if (ret == 0) {
 				filp->f_pos = ext4_get_htree_eof(filp);
-				break;
So ext4_htree_fill_tree() did not return more entries and the while(1)
loop shall be stopped?


Cheers,
Bernd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help