On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:31:58AM -0700, Aditya Kali wrote:

When libext2fs allocates/deletes an extent leaf, the i_blocks
value is incremented/decremented by fs->blocksize / 512. This
is incorrect in case of bigalloc. The correct way here is to
use cluster_size / 512.
The problem is seen if we try to create a large inode using
libext2fs (say using ext2fs_block_iterate3()) on a bigalloc
filesystem. fsck catches this and complains.

Signed-off-by: Aditya Kali <redacted>

Applied, thanks.

					- Ted