Re: [PATCH 5 3/4] nfsd_open(): rename 'int access' to 'int may_flags' in nfsd_open()
From: Ted Ts'o <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-06 00:08:37
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:21:53PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Just rename this variable, as the next patch will add a flag and 'access' as variable name would not be correct any more. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <redacted> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields<redacted> --- fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:21:58PM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Use 32-bit or 64-bit llseek() hashes for directory offsets depending on the NFS version. NFSv2 gets 32-bit hashes only. NOTE: This patch got rather complex as Christoph asked to set the filp->f_mode flag in the open call or immediatly after dentry_open() in nfsd_open() to avoid races. Personally I still do not see a reason for that and in my opinion FMODE_32BITHASH/FMODE_64BITHASH flags could be set nfsd_readdir(), as it follows directly after nfsd_open() without a chance of races. Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <redacted> Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields<redacted> --- fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- fs/nfsd/vfs.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
NFS folks, Since Bruce has ack'ed these patches I assume it will be OK if I carry them in the ext4 tree for merging? (They depend on changes in ext4 found in the first two patches of these patch series.) - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html