Thread (57 messages) 57 messages, 2 authors, 2011-12-19
STALE5335d
Revisions (7)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v2 [diff vs current]
  4. v2 current
  5. v2 [diff vs current]
  6. v3 [diff vs current]
  7. v3 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 16/51] e2fsck: Don't verify bitmap checksums

From: Darrick J. Wong <hidden>
Date: 2011-12-14 01:15:14
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

Since the correct inode and block bitmaps are calculated in pass 5, don't fail
the bitmap read operation in prior passes since (a) incorrect results won't
kill us and (b) if we fail early, we'll never _get_ to pass 5.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <redacted>
---
 e2fsck/util.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/e2fsck/util.c b/e2fsck/util.c
index f00734e..037f270 100644
--- a/e2fsck/util.c
+++ b/e2fsck/util.c
@@ -246,7 +246,9 @@ void e2fsck_read_bitmaps(e2fsck_t ctx)
 	}
 
 	old_op = ehandler_operation(_("reading inode and block bitmaps"));
+	ctx->fs->flags |= EXT2_FLAG_IGNORE_CSUM_ERRORS;
 	retval = ext2fs_read_bitmaps(fs);
+	ctx->fs->flags &= ~EXT2_FLAG_IGNORE_CSUM_ERRORS;
 	ehandler_operation(old_op);
 	if (retval) {
 		com_err(ctx->program_name, retval,
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help