Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't print "do not support" warnings unless verbose is specified
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2011-08-29 05:52:00
Also in:
linux-xfs
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Date: 2011-08-29 05:52:00
Also in:
linux-xfs
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 01:43:22PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
Commit 630421f6d449 attempts to avoid printing the "fallocate not supported" warning if the -q (quiet) option is specified on the command-line. Unfortunately tests 75 and 112 don't set the -q flag. This causes test failures for file systems that don't support fallocate or the punch hole functionality. I considered changing tests 75 and 112 to pass -q to fsx, but that would suppress other warning messages that could be legitimate test failures, so I decided to add a new -v (vebose) flag.
Oh, so now we can have verbose quietness? Or is it quiet verbosity? That quickly leads to insanity.... :/ The quiet flag only suppresses output that is otherwise logged and output when a failure occurs. Hence setting the quiet won't cause any loss of functionality or error detection for these tests so you should just add the quiet flag to the tests. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com