Re: [URGENT PATCH] ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_evict_inode()
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2011-08-26 15:52:41
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 05:27:39PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
No, it doesn't mean the ext4_truncate. But another race pasted below. Flush inode's i_completed_io_list before calling ext4_io_wait to prevent the following deadlock scenario: A page fault happens while some process is writing inode A. During page fault, shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode B. Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait() that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero. However, inode B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue. As the ext4-dio-unwritten thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to grab inode A's i_mutex lock. Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.
... but that shouldn't be a problem since we're not holding A's i_mutex at this point, right? Or am I missing something? - Ted