Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 5 authors, 2011-08-31

Re: [URGENT PATCH] ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_evict_inode()

From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2011-08-26 15:52:41

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 05:27:39PM +0800, Tao Ma wrote:
No, it doesn't mean the ext4_truncate. But another race pasted below.

Flush inode's i_completed_io_list before calling ext4_io_wait to
prevent the following deadlock scenario: A page fault happens while
some process is writing inode A. During page fault,
shrink_icache_memory is called that in turn evicts another inode
B. Inode B has some pending io_end work so it calls ext4_ioend_wait()
that waits for inode B's i_ioend_count to become zero. However, inode
B's ioend work was queued behind some of inode A's ioend work on the
same cpu's ext4-dio-unwritten workqueue. As the ext4-dio-unwritten
thread on that cpu is processing inode A's ioend work, it tries to
grab inode A's i_mutex lock. Since the i_mutex lock of inode A is
still hold before the page fault happened, we enter a deadlock.
... but that shouldn't be a problem since we're not holding A's
i_mutex at this point, right?  Or am I missing something?

	   	       	       	       - Ted
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help