Re: e2p_blocks_count () vs. ext2fs_blocks_count ()

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

Ted Ts'o [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:25:19AM +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote:

 >> Apparently, e2p_blocks_count (), a ‘static’ function in
 >> lib/e2p/ls.c, duplicates the public ext2fs_blocks_count () one
 >> (lib/ext2fs/blknum.c) as of d4c0d8e5.  The same holds for
 >> e2p_r_blocks_count () and e2p_free_blocks_count ().

 >> The code is, as it seems, exactly the same.

 >> I wonder, isn't there a problem?

 > That's deliberate; the goal was to make libe2p not dependent on
 > libext2fs, so that programs such as lsattr don't need to pull in
 > libext2fs.

	ACK.  Thanks.

-- 
FSF associate member #7257	Coming soon: Software Freedom Day
http://mail.sf-day.org/lists/listinfo/ planning-ru (ru), sfd-discuss (en)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html