Re: [PATCH 4/4 v3] XFS TESTS: Fix 252 Failure: Add Generic FS Punch Hole Test 255
From: Alex Elder <hidden>
Date: 2011-07-14 14:37:48
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:37 -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:
On 07/13/2011 09:31 AM, Alex Elder wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 22:24 -0700, Allison Henderson wrote:quoted
This patch adds a new test 255 that tests fallocate punch hole, but is for use by generic filesystems. It is similar to 252, but uses a weaker fiemap filter that only displays the location of the hole, and not the extent types. Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson<redacted>I realize Christoph already committed this but I spotted something so I thought I might as well mention it. I haven't tested any of this, so it may be OK after all, but if it's not then the filter_hole_fiemap() function ought to be updated. -Alex . . .quoted
diff --git a/common.punch b/common.punch index c18f88a..a48b7ae 100644 --- a/common.punch +++ b/common.punch@@ -218,6 +218,23 @@ _filter_fiemap() _coalesce_extents } +# Filters fiemap output to only print the +# file offset column and whether or not +# it is an extent or a hole +_filter_hole_fiemap() +{ + awk --posix ' + $3 ~ /hole/ { + print $1, $2, $3; + next; + } + $5 ~ /0x[[:digit:]]+/ {I believe this should be: $5 ~ /0x[[:xdigit:]]+/ { (I.e., hex digits, not just decimals.)Hi Alex, I think you are right. The extent flags are printed in hex, so it should be xdigit. The existing _filter_fiemap routine that I modeled this code from is also only parsing decimal digits. Even though the tests are not showing any problems right now, it should probably be fixed. Should I submit a patch to correct it?
Please, yes--to fix both. And please verify the problem while you're at it if possible. Thank you. -Alex
Allison Hendersonquoted
quoted
+ print $1, $2, "extent"; + }' | + _coalesce_extents +} + + # Prints the md5 checksum of a given file _md5_checksum() {. . .