Re: your mail
From: Surbhi Palande <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-03 13:57:08
Also in:
linux-fsdevel
On 05/03/2011 04:46 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
On Tue 03-05-11 16:08:36, Surbhi Palande wrote:
Sorry for missing the subject line :(
quoted
On munmap() zap_pte_range() is called which dirties the PTE dirty pages as Toshiyuki pointed out. zap_pte_range() mapping->a_ops->set_page_dirty (= ext4_journalled_set_page_dirty) So, I think that it is here that we should do the checking for a ext4 F.S frozen state and also prevent a parallel ext4 F.S freeze from happening. Attaching a patch for initial review. Please do let me know your thoughts!This is definitely the wrong place. ->set_page_dirty() callbacks are called with various locks held and the page need not be locked (thus dereferencing page->mapping is oopsable). Moreover this particular callback is called only in data=journal mode.
Ok! Thanks for that!
Believe me, the right place is page_mkwrite() - you have to catch the read-only => read-write page transition. Once the page is mapped read-write, you've already lost the race.
My only point is: 1) something should prevent the freeze from happening. We cant merely check the vfs_check_frozen()? And this should be done where the page is marked dirty.Also, I thought that the page is marked read-write only in the page table in the __do_page_fault()? i.e the zap_pte_range() marks them dirty in the page cache? Is this understanding right? IMHO, whatever code dirties the page in the page cache should call a F.S specific function and let it _prevent_ a fsfreeze while the page is getting dirtied, so that a freeze called after this point flushes this page! Warm Regards, Surbhi.
Honza