[PATCH 2/5] mballoc: remove unncessary mb_find_buddy()
From: Coly Li <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-06 04:27:27
Subsystem:
ext4 file system, filesystems (vfs and infrastructure), the rest · Maintainers:
"Theodore Ts'o", Alexander Viro, Christian Brauner, Linus Torvalds
In __mb_check_buddy(), look at the bellowed code,
591 fstart = -1;
592 buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, 0, &max);
593 for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
594 if (!mb_test_bit(i, buddy)) {
595 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(i >= e4b->bd_info->bb_first_free);
596 if (fstart == -1) {
597 fragments++;
598 fstart = i;
599 }
600 continue;
601 }
602 fstart = -1;
603 /* check used bits only */
604 for (j = 0; j < e4b->bd_blkbits + 1; j++) {
605 buddy2 = mb_find_buddy(e4b, j, &max2);
606 k = i >> j;
607 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(k < max2);
608 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(mb_test_bit(k, buddy2));
609 }
610 }
611 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(!EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT(e4b->bd_info));
612 MB_CHECK_ASSERT(e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments == fragments);
613
614 grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, e4b->bd_group);
615 buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, 0, &max);
On line 592, buddy is fetched by mb_find_buddy() with order 0, between
line 593 to line 615, buddy is not changed, therefore there is
no need to fetch buddy again from mb_find_buddy() with order 0 again.
We can safely remove the second mb_find_buddy() on line 615.
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <redacted>
Cc: Alex Tomas <redacted>
Cc: Theodore Tso <redacted>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index d5b372c..458dce0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c@@ -612,7 +612,6 @@ static int __mb_check_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, char *file, MB_CHECK_ASSERT(e4b->bd_info->bb_fragments == fragments); grp = ext4_get_group_info(sb, e4b->bd_group); - buddy = mb_find_buddy(e4b, 0, &max); list_for_each(cur, &grp->bb_prealloc_list) { ext4_group_t groupnr; struct ext4_prealloc_space *pa;
--
1.7.3.4