From: Tao Ma <redacted>

As we have make the consense in the e-mail[1], the trim start should
be added with first_data_block. So this patch fulfill it and remove
the check for start < first_data_block.

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg22737.html

Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Lukas Czerner <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <redacted>
---
 fs/ext3/balloc.c |    7 ++-----
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext3/balloc.c b/fs/ext3/balloc.c
index 971e1bd..13bfebe 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/balloc.c

@@ -2091,7 +2091,8 @@ int ext3_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range)
 	ext3_fsblk_t max_blks = le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count);
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	start = range->start >> sb->s_blocksize_bits;
+	start = (range->start >> sb->s_blocksize_bits) +
+		le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);
 	len = range->len >> sb->s_blocksize_bits;
 	minlen = range->minlen >> sb->s_blocksize_bits;
 	trimmed = 0;

@@ -2100,10 +2101,6 @@ int ext3_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	if (start >= max_blks)
 		goto out;
-	if (start < le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block)) {
-		len -= le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block) - start;
-		start = le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);
-	}
 	if (start + len > max_blks)
 		len = max_blks - start;