Re: [PATCH 02/18] xstat: Add a pair of system calls to make extended file stats available [ver #6]
From: Arnd Bergmann <hidden>
Date: 2010-07-16 11:02:35
Also in:
linux-cifs, linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml
On Friday 16 July 2010, David Howells wrote:
Mark Harris [off-list ref] wrote:
So how about using up the dead space for what Steve French wanted:
| One hole that this reminded me about is how to return the superblock
| time granularity (for NFSv4 this is attribute 51 "time_delta" which
| is called on a superblock not on a file). We run into time rounding
| issues with Samba too.
By doing something like:
struct xstat_time {
signed long long tv_sec;
unsigned int tv_nsec;
unsigned short tv_granularity;
unsigned short tv_gran_units;
};I like that!
Where tv_granularity is the minimum granularity for tv_sec and tv_nsec given
as a quantity of tv_gran_units. tv_gran_units could then be a constant, such
as:
XSTAT_NANOSECONDS_GRANULARITY
XSTAT_MICROSECONDS_GRANULARITY
XSTAT_MILLISECONDS_GRANULARITY
XSTAT_SECONDS_GRANULARITY
XSTAT_MINUTES_GRANULARITY
XSTAT_HOURS_GRANULARITY
XSTAT_DAYS_GRANULARITY
So, for example, FAT times are a 2s granularity, so FAT would set
tv_granularity to 2 and tv_gran_units to XSTAT_SECONDS_GRANULARITY.
You could also define the tv_gran_units to be power-of-ten nanoseconds,
making it a decimal floating point number like
enum {
XSTAT_NANOSECONDS_GRANULARITY = 0,
XSTAT_MICROSECONDS_GRANULARITY = 3,
XSTAT_MILLISECONDS_GRANULARITY = 6,
XSTAT_SECONDS_GRANULARITY = 9,
};
That would make it easier to define an xstat_time_before() function, though
it means that you could no longer do XSTAT_MINUTES_GRANULARITY and
higher directly other than { .tv_gran_units = 10, .tv_granularity = 6, }.
We could even support picosecond granularity if we made tv_nsec a 5-byte
field (tv_psec):
struct xstat_time {
signed long long tv_sec;
unsigned long long tv_gran_units : 8;
unsigned long long tv_granularity : 16;
unsigned long long tv_psec : 48;
};
but that's probably excessive. Does any filesystem we currently support need
that?I wouldn't even go that far if we needed sub-ns (I don't think we do), because that breaks old compilers that cannot do bit fields. Arnd