Re: [PATCH] extend e2fsprogs functionality to add EXT2_FLAG_DIRECT option
From: Michal Novotny <hidden>
Date: 2010-01-12 13:13:09
On 01/12/2010 02:04 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 01/12/2010 08:01 AM, Michal Novotny wrote:quoted
On 01/12/2010 01:46 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:30:40PM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote:quoted
Not really, pygrub doesn't do any manipulation with file system and also, it's not working on a life file system. It's called before the guest boots up to read information about grub.conf/initrd and kernel for PV guest and after this is read and selected in pygrub then the guest is booted using the kernel and initrd extracted from the image (after which the file is closed). Once again, nothing uses write support and it was added just to make it use O_DIRECT for both read and write operations but only pygrub uses only read support and O_DIRECT passed here is the only way to make it use non-cached data.So what caches get in the way? From the above it seems the situation is the following: - filesystem N is a guest filesystem. It's not usually mounted on the host, except for initial setup long time agoYes, it is really a guest file system. This is not mounted in the host and the reason is to get actual version of grub.conf, initrd and kernel to be booted...quoted
- before booting a guest your "pygrub" tools needs to read files on it, and it's doing so using e2fsprogsCorrect.quoted
- once the guest is life it uses the extN kernel driver to access the filesystemThat's right. So this is no longer pygrub responsibility...quoted
nowhere in this cycle you should have any stale cached data. The kernel always makes sure to write back data on umount/reboot, as does e2fsprogs if actually used to write data (which you said is not the case anyway).In fact I was unable to run into those problems myself but reporter/customer did.quoted
The only data that may be in the cache are unmodified data from reads on the block device from either e2fsprogs or a suboptimal virtual block device implementation, but these can't cause any problems.MichalIf the guest is the only one (when running) that installs a new grub.conf file and kernel and it shuts down properly, you should be good. It if does not shut down cleanly, it could have a stale grub.conf file (or worse, a partially written one), but using O_DIRECT to bypass the file system cache should not help. If we cannot reproduce this failure, sounds like we need to go back and get a better understanding of what the customer saw? ric
That's right. I am going write an e-mail regarding this information to the reproducer if this bug and tell him that I need more information about what's happening at the customer side. Michal