Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2009-09-01

Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret (was Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible)

From: Jesse Brandeburg <hidden>
Date: 2009-08-31 22:26:42
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:07 AM, martin f krafft[off-list ref] wrote:
also sprach Jesse Brandeburg [off-list ref] [2009.08.31.1949 +0200]:
quoted
In the case of a degraded array, could the kernel be more
proactive (or maybe even mdadm) and have the filesystem remount
itself withOUT journalling enabled?  This seems on the surface to
be possible, but I don't know the internal particulars that might
prevent/allow it.
Why would I want to disable the filesystem journal in that case?
I misspoke w.r.t journalling, the idea I was trying to get across was
to remount with -o sync while running on a degraded array, but given
some of the other comments in this thread I'm not even sure that would
help.  the idea was to make writes as safe as possible (at the cost of
speed) when running on a degraded array, and to have the transition be
as hands-free as possible, just have the kernel (or mdadm) by default
remount.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help