Re: [PATCH] vfs: introduce helper function to safely NUL-terminate symlinks | linux-ext4 | Ratatoskr

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: [PATCH] vfs: introduce helper function to safely NUL-terminate symlinks · Andreas Dilger <hidden> · 2008-12-16
Re: [PATCH] vfs: introduce helper function to safely NUL-terminate symlinks · Duane Griffin <hidden> · 2008-12-17
Re: [PATCH] vfs: introduce helper function to safely NUL-terminate symlinks · Duane Griffin <hidden> · 2008-12-19
Re: [PATCH] vfs: introduce helper function to safely NUL-terminate symlinks · Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> · 2008-12-19
Re: [PATCH] vfs: introduce helper function to safely NUL-terminate symlinks · Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> · 2008-12-19

Re: [PATCH] vfs: introduce helper function to safely NUL-terminate symlinks

From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2008-12-19 19:28:39
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:03:52 +0000
"Duane Griffin" [off-list ref] wrote:

2008/12/17 Duane Griffin [off-list ref]:

quoted

It is true for sysv, too. The ufs code also, but that has other
issues, anyway. The generic page symlink and freevxfs patches should
be fine, though.

Before I fire off another set of patches, should I be sending out the
complete set again or just the ones that need to be updated?

It's more reliable to resend everything.