Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2008-10-07

Re: [PATCH] Improve buffered streaming write ordering

From: Nick Piggin <hidden>
Date: 2008-10-07 14:46:06
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Wednesday 08 October 2008 00:36, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 09:29:11AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
quoted
That's true, but there is a lot of code duplication, which means that
bugs or changes in write_cache_pages() would need to be fixed in
ext4_write_cache_pages().  So another approach that might be better
from a long-term code maintenance point of view is to add a flag in
struct writeback_control that tells write_cache_pages() not to update
those fields, and avoid duplicating approximately 95 lines of code.
It means a change in a core mm function, though, so if folks thinks
its too ugly, we can make our own copy in fs/ext4.
Heh, funny you should mention that. I was looking at it just the other
day. It's riddled with bugs (some of which supposedly are by-design
circumventing of data integrity).

http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2008-10/msg00917.html

I'm also looking (in the same thread) at doing a patch to improve fsync
performance and ensure it doesn't get stuck behind concurrent dirtiers
by adding another tag to the radix-tree. Mikulas is also looking at
improving that problem with another method. It would be nice if fsdevel
gurus would participate (I'll send out my patchset when I get it working,
and recap the situation and competing ideas).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help