Re: [PATCH 1/3] Implement generic freeze feature
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2008-06-24 21:49:09
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-xfs, lkml
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:59:50 +0900 Takashi Sato [off-list ref] wrote:
I have modified to set the suitable error number (EOPNOTSUPP)
in case the filesystem doesn't support the freeze feature.
This was pointed out by Andreas Dilger.
The ioctls for the generic freeze feature are below.
o Freeze the filesystem
int ioctl(int fd, int FIFREEZE, arg)
fd: The file descriptor of the mountpoint
FIFREEZE: request code for the freeze
arg: Ignored
Return value: 0 if the operation succeeds. Otherwise, -1
o Unfreeze the filesystem
int ioctl(int fd, int FITHAW, arg)
fd: The file descriptor of the mountpoint
FITHAW: request code for unfreeze
arg: Ignored
Return value: 0 if the operation succeeds. Otherwise, -1
...
+/*
+ * get_super_without_lock - Get super_block from block_device without lock.
+ * @bdev: block device struct
+ *
+ * Scan the superblock list and finds the superblock of the file system
+ * mounted on the block device given. This doesn't lock anyone.
+ * %NULL is returned if no match is found.
+ */This is not a terribly good comment. Which lock are we not taking? I _assume_ that it's referring to s_umount? If so, the text should describe that. It should also go to some lengths explaining why this dangerous-looking and rather nasty-looking function exists. Look at it this way: there is no way in which the reviewer of this patch (ie: me) can work out why this function exists. Hence there will be no way in which future readers of this code will be able to work out why this function exists either. This is bad. These things should be described in code comments and in the changelog (whichever is most appropriate).
+struct super_block *get_super_without_lock(struct block_device *bdev)
+{
+ struct super_block *sb;
+
+ if (!bdev)
+ return NULL;
+
+ spin_lock(&sb_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(sb, &super_blocks, s_list) {
+ if (sb->s_bdev == bdev) {
+ if (sb->s_root) {
+ sb->s_count++;
+ spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
+ return sb;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
+ return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_super_without_lock);