Re: [PATCH] Do not try lock_acquire after handle made invalid
From: Mingming Cao <hidden>
Date: 2008-01-16 23:59:56
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 15:59 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:39:26 +0100 Jonas Bonn [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
This likely fixes the oops in __lock_acquire reported as: http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=2753&msgid= http://www.kerneloops.org/raw.php?rawid=2749&msgid= In these reported oopses, start_this_handle is returning -EROFS. Signed-off-by: Jonas Bonn <redacted> --- fs/jbd/transaction.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/jbd/transaction.c b/fs/jbd/transaction.c index 08ff6c7..038ed74 100644 --- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c +++ b/fs/jbd/transaction.c@@ -288,10 +288,12 @@ handle_t *journal_start(journal_t *journal, int nblocks) jbd_free_handle(handle); current->journal_info = NULL; handle = ERR_PTR(err); + goto out; } lock_acquire(&handle->h_lockdep_map, 0, 0, 0, 2, _THIS_IP_); +out: return handle; }Yeah, thanks. It looks like we forgot to port this lockdep support into ext4. This is bad. What else got lost?
Here is the ext4/jbd2 port of the original lockdep patch with the above fix. Please let me know if I missed anything. It's likely there are other jbd/ext3 changes missed out in ext4/jbd2. I will take a look at the git tree and do a cleanup. Thanks for pointing this out. --------------------------------------------------------- jbd2: lockdep support for jbd2
Except lockdep doesn't know about journal_start(), which has ranking requirements similar to a semaphore.
Ported from lockdep jbd patch. Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <redacted> --- fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 11 +++++++++++ include/linux/jbd2.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+) Index: linux-2.6.24-rc7/fs/jbd2/transaction.c ===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-rc7.orig/fs/jbd2/transaction.c 2008-01-16 15:30:24.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc7/fs/jbd2/transaction.c 2008-01-16 15:41:14.000000000 -0800@@ -241,6 +241,8 @@ out: return ret; } +static struct lock_class_key jbd2_handle_key; + /* Allocate a new handle. This should probably be in a slab... */ static handle_t *new_handle(int nblocks) {
@@ -251,6 +253,9 @@ static handle_t *new_handle(int nblocks) handle->h_buffer_credits = nblocks; handle->h_ref = 1; + lockdep_init_map(&handle->h_lockdep_map, "jbd2_handle", + &jbd2_handle_key, 0); + return handle; }
@@ -293,7 +298,11 @@ handle_t *jbd2_journal_start(journal_t * jbd2_free_handle(handle); current->journal_info = NULL; handle = ERR_PTR(err); + goto out; } + + lock_acquire(&handle->h_lockdep_map, 0, 0, 0, 2, _THIS_IP_); +out: return handle; }
@@ -1419,6 +1428,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_stop(handle_t *handle) spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); } + lock_release(&handle->h_lockdep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); + jbd2_free_handle(handle); return err; }
Index: linux-2.6.24-rc7/include/linux/jbd2.h ===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.24-rc7.orig/include/linux/jbd2.h 2008-01-16 15:29:03.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc7/include/linux/jbd2.h 2008-01-16 15:29:54.000000000 -0800@@ -418,6 +418,10 @@ struct handle_s unsigned int h_sync: 1; /* sync-on-close */ unsigned int h_jdata: 1; /* force data journaling */ unsigned int h_aborted: 1; /* fatal error on handle */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC + struct lockdep_map h_lockdep_map; +#endif };