Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2007-11-30

Re: [RFC] support multiple max offset limits for a single superblock

From: Chris Wedgwood <hidden>
Date: 2007-11-30 17:26:26
Also in: linux-fsdevel

On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:35:01AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
I could do the same for ext4, but Chris Mason prodded me to think of something
more generic... this is what I came up with.
I think it (for now) should remain in the few file-systems that are
affected to avoid making a new ->i_op right now.  If it turns out this
is a more commonly need in the future we could do this, but it seems a
bit heavy handy just yet given at present.

Also, it might turn at that it makes sense to to on-the-fly conversion
in the filesystem (where applicable) at some later stage, so this
wouldn't be useful there.  I assume it's probably hard to convert a
large bitmap-based ext4 file to an extent-based one (how large can a
transaction be?) but that might not always be the case and it's
probably fine for smaller files.
(BTW another option would be to convert old-format files when
accessed, but that has its own set of tradeoffs...)
I think doing that where possible makes more sense.  As I said above
I'm not sure how easy that is to do for all files, but then again fsck
could take care of those if prodded.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help