Re: [PATCH] e2fsck/e2fsprogs: use sscanf() instead of atoi() in the option parser

[PATCH] e2fsck/e2fsprogs: use sscanf() instead of atoi() in the option parser · Bernd Schubert <hidden> · 2007-08-01
Re: [PATCH] e2fsck/e2fsprogs: use sscanf() instead of atoi() in the option parser · Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> · 2007-08-04
Re: [PATCH] e2fsck/e2fsprogs: use sscanf() instead of atoi() in the option parser · Bernd Schubert <hidden> · 2007-08-06

From: Bernd Schubert <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-06 11:18:58

Hello Ted,

In your patch submissions.  See the SUBMITTING-PATCHES file in the
top-level directory of e2fsprogs source tree for the significance of
the Signed-off-by line.  For this patch, can you indicate whether you
are willing to add a Signed-off-by: DCO?

sorry that I did not read that file and so didn't know a signed-off is 
required.

Sure I'm willing to add a signed-off :) I'm also adding the patch again to 
this mail.


Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <redacted>


Cheers,
Bernd

-- 
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH

Attachments

sscanf_instead_of_atoi.patch [text/x-diff] 2246 bytes · preview

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help