-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I read from manual and source code, it seems fragment size should be
same to filesystem block size. Therefore, can I say current ext3/4
filesystem still do not support fragment ?

Thanks.

Coly


Andreas Dilger wrote:

On Aug 02, 2007  17:55 +0800, Coly Li wrote:

quoted

These days, when I read the source code of mke2fs, I found an option -f
to set the fragment size.

But I can not find any explaining for ext3/4 framgment from google,
excepting someone saying ext2/3 does not support this feature.

Can anyone tell me what is the function or purpose of fragment of ext
file system ?

This is an obsolete concept from BSD that was never used by ext[234].
Consider a "fragment" in this context to be the same as a "tail" for
reiserfs.  A very small file, or the end of a file that is less than
a block.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGsvJIuTp8cyZ5lTERAltpAJ9BhpdjoKQUx001KSQP2oR8HNaXsQCZAbyJ
ASnxX0wXDEaU8q5Syvp83yk=
=IYRx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----