Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 4 authors, 2007-07-20

Re: [PATCH] Faster ext2_clear_inode()

From: Jörn Engel <hidden>
Date: 2007-07-09 08:37:58
Also in: linux-fsdevel

On Mon, 9 July 2007 08:11:22 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
If CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL is not configured, ext2_clear_inode() will be empty
function. However, there still will be call and immediate return which can be
avoided.
[...]
+#ifdef CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL
 static void ext2_clear_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_EXT2_FS_POSIX_ACL
 	struct ext2_inode_info *ei = EXT2_I(inode);
 
 	if (ei->i_acl && ei->i_acl != EXT2_ACL_NOT_CACHED) {
@@ -197,8 +197,10 @@ static void ext2_clear_inode(struct inode *inode)
 		posix_acl_release(ei->i_default_acl);
 		ei->i_default_acl = EXT2_ACL_NOT_CACHED;
 	}
-#endif
 }
+#else
+#define ext2_clear_inode NULL
+#endif
Are you sure your patch makes a difference?  Does the resulting binary
change at all?

Jörn

-- 
Fancy algorithms are slow when n is small, and n is usually small.
Fancy algorithms have big constants. Until you know that n is
frequently going to be big, don't get fancy.
-- Rob Pike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help