Re: [PATCH v10 2/7] arm64: hyperv: Add Hyper-V hypercall and register access utilities
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: 2021-05-14 12:53:01
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-hyperv, lkml
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:37:42AM -0700, Michael Kelley wrote:
hyperv-tlfs.h defines Hyper-V interfaces from the Hyper-V Top Level Functional Spec (TLFS), and #includes the architecture-independent part of hyperv-tlfs.h in include/asm-generic. The published TLFS is distinctly oriented to x86/x64, so the ARM64-specific hyperv-tlfs.h includes information for ARM64 that is not yet formally published. The TLFS is available here: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/virtualization/hyper-v-on-windows/reference/tlfs mshyperv.h defines Linux-specific structures and routines for interacting with Hyper-V on ARM64, and #includes the architecture- independent part of mshyperv.h in include/asm-generic. Use these definitions to provide utility functions to make Hyper-V hypercalls and to get and set Hyper-V provided registers associated with a virtual processor. Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley <redacted> Reviewed-by: Sunil Muthuswamy <redacted> --- MAINTAINERS | 3 + arch/arm64/Kbuild | 1 + arch/arm64/hyperv/Makefile | 2 + arch/arm64/hyperv/hv_core.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h | 69 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h | 54 +++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 259 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/hyperv/Makefile create mode 100644 arch/arm64/hyperv/hv_core.c create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mshyperv.h
+/*
+ * hv_do_hypercall- Invoke the specified hypercall
+ */
+u64 hv_do_hypercall(u64 control, void *input, void *output)
+{
+ struct arm_smccc_res res;
+ u64 input_address;
+ u64 output_address;
+
+ input_address = input ? virt_to_phys(input) : 0;
+ output_address = output ? virt_to_phys(output) : 0;I may have asked this before, but are `input` and `output` always linear map pointers, or can they ever be vmalloc pointers? Otherwise, this looks fine to me. Mark.