[PATCH v6] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy · Len Baker <hidden> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH v6] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy · Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> · 2021-09-03
Re: [PATCH v6] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy · Len Baker <hidden> · 2021-09-04
Re: [PATCH v6] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy · Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> · 2021-09-04
Re: [PATCH v6] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy · Len Baker <hidden> · 2021-09-04
[PATCH] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy, sprintf and snprintf · Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> · 2021-09-13
Re: [PATCH] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy, sprintf and snprintf · Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> · 2021-09-15
Re: [PATCH] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy, sprintf and snprintf · Len Baker <hidden> · 2021-09-18

Re: [PATCH v6] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy

From: Len Baker <hidden>
Date: 2021-09-04 13:23:20
Also in: linux-hardening, lkml

Hi,

On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 01:36:26PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:

On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 01:23:03PM +0200, Len Baker wrote:

quoted

I can remove the macro and add a comment with some explanation.

No, please leave the macro.

Ok, so I leave the patch as is.

Thanks,
Len