Re: [PATCH] docs: process: use gender-neutral pronouns

Ruben Sutton [off-list ref] writes:

Several process documents use gendered pronouns when referring
generically to developers and maintainers. Use singular they instead,
making the language inclusive without changing its meaning.

Leave pronouns referring to named people and text in attributed
quotations unchanged.

Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Ruben Sutton <redacted>
---
 Documentation/process/2.Process.rst            | 2 +-
 Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst            | 2 +-
 Documentation/process/6.Followthrough.rst      | 2 +-
 Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst | 2 +-
 Documentation/process/howto.rst                | 2 +-
 Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst   | 2 +-
 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Ouch.

I have no objection in principle to this change, but if we try to clean
up the whole kernel in this way we're going to have a *lot* of churn
and, undoubtedly, some unpleasant discussions at some point.

I'm tempted to raise this question at the maintainers summit to see if I
can get some sort of project-wide policy laid out.

Thanks,

jon