[PATCH v7 01/12] sched/docs: Document cpu_preferred_mask and Preferred CPU concept
From: Shrikanth Hegde <hidden>
Date: 2026-07-09 21:57:59
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
documentation, the rest · Maintainers:
Jonathan Corbet, Linus Torvalds
Add documentation for new cpumask called cpu_preferred_mask. This could help users in understanding what this mask is and the concept behind it. Document how to enable it and implementation aspects of it. Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606180717.yNM0yb41-lkp@intel.com/ (local) Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <redacted> --- Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
index ed07efea7d02..82bc27c7daac 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-arch.rst@@ -62,6 +62,64 @@ Your cpu_idle routines need to obey the following rules: arch/x86/kernel/process.c has examples of both polling and sleeping idle functions. +Preferred CPUs +============== + +In virtualised environments it is possible to overcommit CPU resources. i.e. +the sum of virtual CPUs (vCPUs) of all VMs is greater than number of physical +CPUs (pCPUs). Under such conditions when all or many VMs have high utilization, +hypervisor won't be able to satisfy the CPU requirement and has to context +switch within or across VMs. The hypervisor needs to preempt one vCPU to run +another. This is called vCPU preemption. This is more expensive compared to +task context switch within a vCPU. + +In such cases it is better that combined vCPU ask from all VMs is reduced +by not using some of the vCPUs in each VM. vCPUs where workload can be safely +scheduled which won't increase any contention for pCPU are called as +"Preferred CPUs". + +Main design construct is preferred CPUs are always a subset of active CPUs. +In most cases preferred CPUs will be same as active CPUs, when there is pCPU +contention, Preferred CPUs will reduce based on the amount of steal time. +When the pCPU contention goes away as indicated by steal time, Preferred CPUs +will become same as active CPUs again. This is done by loading the +steal_monitor driver available at drivers/virt/steal_monitor. + +For scheduling decisions such as wakeup, pushing the task etc, needs this +CPU state info. This is maintained in cpu_preferred_mask. +vCPUs which are not in cpu_preferred_mask should be treated as vCPUs which +should not be used at this moment provided it doesn't break user affinity. + +This is achieved by: + +1. Selecting a preferred CPU at wakeup using fallback mechanism. +2. Push the task away from non-preferred CPU at tick. +3. Only select preferred CPUs for load balance. + +/sys/devices/system/cpu/preferred prints the current cpu_preferred_mask in +cpulist format. + +Notes: + +1. This feature is available under CONFIG_PREFERRED_CPU. It is selected + by steal_monitor driver (CONFIG_STEAL_MONITOR=y). On enabling the driver, + CPU preferred state can change based on steal time. Without that driver, + preferred CPUs is same as active CPUs. + +2. This feature works for FAIR class only. + +3. A task pinned, which can't be moved to preferred CPUs will continue + to run based on its affinity. But no load balancing happens. + +4. Decision to use/not use is driven by kernel. Hence it shouldn't + break user affinities. One of the main reasons why CPU hotplug + or Isolated cpuset partitions was not a solution. + +5. This feature works best only when all the VMs enable the feature as + it is a co-operative scheme. If a specific VM doesn't enable this feature + it may end up with more CPUs than others, still should lead to better + performance when seen from system view. + Users who enable this driver must ensure it is enabled in all VMs. Possible arch/ problems =======================
--
2.47.3