Re: [PATCH 1/2] filelock: add lease_dispose_list() helper
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-12-03 19:33:42
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-nfs, lkml
On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 13:55 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025, at 10:08 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:quoted
...and call that from the lease handling code instead of locks_dispose_list(). Remove the lease handling parts from locks_dispose_list().The actual change here isn't bothering me, but I'm having trouble understanding why it's needed. It doesn't appear to be a strict functional prerequisite for 2/2.
It's not. We can table this patch for now if that's preferable, but I do think it's a worthwhile cleanup.
A little more context in the commit message would be helpful. Sample commit description: The lease-handling code paths always know they're disposing of leases, yet locks_dispose_list() checks flags at runtime to determine whether to call locks_free_lease() or locks_free_lock(). Split out a dedicated lease_dispose_list() helper for lease code paths. This makes the type handling explicit and prepares for the upcoming lease_manager enhancements where lease-specific operations are being consolidated.
I may crib this if I end up resending it.
But that reflects only my naive understanding of the patch. You might have something else in mind.
Nope, no ulterior motive here. It's just a nice to have cleanup that helps to further separate the lock and lease handling code.
quoted
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> --- fs/locks.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.cindex 7f4ccc7974bc8d3e82500ee692c6520b53f2280f..e974f8e180fe48682a271af4f143e6bc8e9c4d3b 100644--- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c@@ -369,10 +369,19 @@ locks_dispose_list(struct list_head *dispose) while (!list_empty(dispose)) { flc = list_first_entry(dispose, struct file_lock_core, flc_list); list_del_init(&flc->flc_list); - if (flc->flc_flags & (FL_LEASE|FL_DELEG|FL_LAYOUT)) - locks_free_lease(file_lease(flc)); - else - locks_free_lock(file_lock(flc)); + locks_free_lock(file_lock(flc)); + } +} + +static void +lease_dispose_list(struct list_head *dispose) +{ + struct file_lock_core *flc; + + while (!list_empty(dispose)) { + flc = list_first_entry(dispose, struct file_lock_core, flc_list); + list_del_init(&flc->flc_list); + locks_free_lease(file_lease(flc)); } }@@ -1620,7 +1629,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int flags) spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem); - locks_dispose_list(&dispose); + lease_dispose_list(&dispose); error = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(new_fl->c.flc_wait, list_empty(&new_fl->c.flc_blocked_member), break_time);@@ -1643,7 +1652,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsignedint flags) out: spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem); - locks_dispose_list(&dispose); + lease_dispose_list(&dispose); free_lock: locks_free_lease(new_fl); return error;@@ -1726,7 +1735,7 @@ static int __fcntl_getlease(struct file *filp,unsigned int flavor) spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem); - locks_dispose_list(&dispose); + lease_dispose_list(&dispose); } return type; }@@ -1895,7 +1904,7 @@ generic_add_lease(struct file *filp, int arg,struct file_lease **flp, void **pr out: spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem); - locks_dispose_list(&dispose); + lease_dispose_list(&dispose); if (is_deleg) inode_unlock(inode); if (!error && !my_fl)@@ -1931,7 +1940,7 @@ static int generic_delete_lease(struct file*filp, void *owner) error = fl->fl_lmops->lm_change(victim, F_UNLCK, &dispose); spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem); - locks_dispose_list(&dispose); + lease_dispose_list(&dispose); return error; }@@ -2726,7 +2735,7 @@ locks_remove_lease(struct file *filp, structfile_lock_context *ctx) spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock); percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem); - locks_dispose_list(&dispose); + lease_dispose_list(&dispose); } /* -- 2.52.0
-- Jeff Layton [off-list ref]