On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:04:20 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:

Em Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:15:44 +0900
Akira Yokosawa [off-list ref] escreveu:

quoted

[-CC: rust people and list]

OK, Looks like I have to bite.

On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 15:33:34 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
[...]

quoted

The current approach of using LaTeX for PDF is dirty:

- Sphinx can't produce a LaTeX file from the Kernel trees without
  hundreds of warnings;
- latexmk hides some of them, but even it just one warning is reported,
  the return status is not zero.  

This sounds interesting to me.
As far I remember, I have never seen such strange results of latexmk
under build envs where all the necessary packages are properly installed.

I saw it here on multiple distros including Fedora (which is the one
I use on my desktop). Media jenkins CI running on Debian always suffered
from such issues, up to the point I started ignoring pdf build results.

So please provide exact steps for me to see such errors.

I don't have any issues after strictly following the suggestions from
sphinx-pre-install under Fedora.

I even invoked [...]/output/latex/Makefile manually after running
"make latexdocs" by:

  - cd [...]/output/latex/
  - make PDFLATEX="latexmk -xelatex" LATEXOPTS="-interaction=batchmode -no-shell-escape" -j6 -O all

, and all the PDFs were built without any issues.

Quite puzzling ...

Or does your Fedora have some Noto CJK variable fonts installed?

Hmm ...

Thanks,
Akira