Thread (101 messages) 101 messages, 25 authors, 2025-08-12

Re: [PATCH 4/4] agents: add legal requirements and agent attribution guidelines

From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Date: 2025-08-05 23:33:39
Also in: lkml, workflows

On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 02:11:50AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 03:08:45PM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
quoted
On 7/27/2025 12:58 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
quoted
And below is the first test of this scheme:

Co-developed-by: Claude claude-opus-4-20250514
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 Documentation/agents/index.rst |  3 ++-
 Documentation/agents/legal.rst | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 Documentation/agents/main.rst  |  5 ++++
 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/agents/legal.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/agents/index.rst b/Documentation/agents/index.rst
index 354af3f025e5..982602db3349 100644
--- a/Documentation/agents/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/agents/index.rst
@@ -9,4 +9,5 @@ Agents

    main
    core
-   coding-style
\ No newline at end of file
+   coding-style
+   legal
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/Documentation/agents/legal.rst b/Documentation/agents/legal.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..67e6b2cdff9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/agents/legal.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+===============================
+Legal Requirements for Agents
+===============================
+
+This document outlines critical legal requirements that coding agents must follow when working with the Linux kernel codebase.
+
+Licensing Requirements
+----------------------
+
+**GPL-2.0 License**
+  The Linux kernel is licensed under GPL-2.0 only with a syscall exception. Coding agents MUST follow this licensing rule with no exceptions. Any code contributed must be compatible with this license.
+
+**SPDX License Identifiers**
+  All files must have proper SPDX license identifiers. For most kernel source files, this should be the first line of the file in the appropriate comment format:
+
+  - For C source/header files: ``// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0``
+  - For scripts: ``# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0``
+  - For documentation: ``.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0``
I believe the agent has not processed the following correctly:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/license-rules.html

1) C header files use /* SPDX-License-Identifier: <expression> */
2) Contributions need not be GPL-2.0, "individual files can be provided under
a dual license, e.g. one of the compatible GPL variants and alternatively
under a permissive license like BSD, MIT etc."

These two issues jumped out at me...
And the text isn't properly wrapped. Also, compiling the series, I get

----------------------------------------
Documentation/agents/main.rst:3: WARNING: Title overline too short.

=====================================
Linux Kernel Development Agent Instructions
=====================================

[...]

Documentation/agents/index.rst: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree [toc.not_included]
----------------------------------------

<irony>

Sasha, please make sure you read the kernel documentation before
submitting patches. We understand there's a learning curve, but we
expect contributors to perform due diligence to avoid wasting the time
of reviewers. I would have expected a human developer submitting patches
generated by LLMs to have proof-read the patches, compiled them, and
fixed those issues.

</irony>
I thought I was being smart doing that so only AI agents would see that
stuff but it wouldn't appear in any human readable documentation.

I haven't realized checkpatch would complain :)

Anyways, I need to resend this with the improvements suggested by Kees
and Greg where we instead improve and expand the README at root. Let me
go clean it up...

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help