Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 2 authors, 2023-08-16

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Split 64-bit write to 32-bit writes

From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Date: 2023-08-16 14:01:17
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On 15/08/2023 21:46, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
Hi Suzuki,

On Tue, 15 Aug 2023, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
quoted
On 15/08/2023 07:35, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
quoted
Split the 64-bit register accesses if 64-bit access is not supported
by the PMU.

Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Besar Wicaksono <redacted>
Do we need a Fixes tag ?
I believe, NVIDIA's PMU supports 64-bit access while Ampere's one 
doesn't and since this patchset enables support for the latter one, it 
doesn't seem like we need a Fixes tag here.
Ok, makes sense.

Suzuki

Cheers, Ilkka
quoted
With that:

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

Suzuki
quoted
---
  drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c 
b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
index 04be94b4aa48..6387cbad7a7d 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
@@ -715,7 +715,10 @@ static void arm_cspmu_write_counter(struct 
perf_event *event, u64 val)
      if (use_64b_counter_reg(cspmu)) {
          offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u64), event->hw.idx);
  -        writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
+        if (cspmu->has_atomic_dword)
+            writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
+        else
+            lo_hi_writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
quoted
      } else {
          offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u32), event->hw.idx);
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help